After Kim Kardashian, 40, left her little sister Khloe out of her throwback picture from her “college years“, Khloe Kardashian, 37, took to her social media on Thursday to right the wrong and shared an additional picture from their trip to the University of Arizona, where their eldest sister Kourtney Kardashian was studying at the time.
“Thanks Keeks! Ummmm, hello!! I was there too! I know I was smiling on the inside #UofA,” she commented on the post, which showed the three sisters standing together amid a crowd of young partygoers, with Kim and Kourtney smiling at the camera while Khloe Kardashian smouldered mysteriously instead.
Although this additional pic delighted Khloe Kardashian’s 176 million Instagram followers, with the post quickly gaining over 1.5 million likes, it was the comments section that got tongues wagging.
Khloe Kardashian shared major throwback!
While Kim Kardashian reminisced about her “college years” in her post and shared a hilarious incident from the trip which “single-handedly stopped [her] from turning into a wild party girl,” the Good American founder’s comments section was going off, after her sister Kourtney Kardashian, 42, revealed that while they were visiting her they got up to some fun mischief.
“The night of the Khlo-motion party where we put Jungle Juice in the water cooler!,” the Poosh founder reminisced, which got many fans begging for details, but Khloe Kardashian made it clear that they’ll be keeping the details to themselves, joking she doesn’t “need any more legal problems”.
Khloe Kardashian wrote, “Thank God I have you! Kimberly totally tried to box me out of that whole adventure. I literally am the reason why you guys all got home safe LOL.”
While also jokingly adding that they wouldn’t be able to go into “too many details because I don’t need any more legal problems.”
Potentially making a reference to the recent legal troubles she and mom Kris Jenner experienced with the construction of their Hidden Hills mansions after the reality star revealed on KUWTK that the “shady contractor” they had employed, had run off with the deeds to their side-by-side homes and “a lot” of money.